First, I sincerely hope that Boris does not 'win' anything – but with postal votes system he is almost guaranteed a 'win'.

Second, I don't want to see my homeland ripped apart into small satellite statelets of Brussels. That is the way back to feudalism, bondage, and slavery; a version of the communist soviet system. We hear a lot about 'localism' form the political elite these days; by 'localism' we should understand it to mean soviets of the EU.

As for the so-called Scottish independence; if they vote for it the Scots will very likely find themselves to be a small and insignificant vassal state of the EU; which is what all the talk of localism, English parliaments, and city states is all about. The aim is to break up the UK, and England in particular, into vassal states of the EU. It's the old paradigm shift routine again; identify the 'solution' – then create the problem – then publicise the original 'solution' as the answer to the created problem; and we, the people, fall for it every time. Treason has been committed against us, and it continues to be committed against us by the very politicians who are supposed to be representing the electorate, but are in fact acting as foreign agents.

One day, probably much sooner than most of us appreciate, we shall wake up to find we have completely lost all our freedoms and nationality, and are living under an oppressive police state directed from Brussels.

Moley, I fully agree with you, Boris is extremely dangerous.

Whenever Boris is being interviewed, his behaviour, body language, his constant re-framing of what he is trying to say - and changing tack; all suggest to me that he is extremely devious, untrustworthy, and holds the people in total and utter contempt. He knows full well what his instructions and purposes are; but he isn't going to let the public know what is going on under that ridiculous mop of unruly hair. Behind all that apparent buffoonery is one very dangerous individual.

^^ Spot on Westonman. I may have disagreed with a lot of Ken Livingston's policies in the past, but one thing in his favour as far as I'm concerned, is that he was honest and open about them. Johnson is the polar opposite.

Boris Johnson is all about promoting himself, and travelling to the Far East to promote the selling of large swathes of new developments in London to overseas speculators. The Battersea and Nine Elms project being the latest example. How many Londoners will ever be able to afford to buy those properties, let alone rent them ?

I suspect the majority of those properties will remain empty for years, whilst the developers and speculators will gain tax breaks and Londoners will be driven further and further out.

It's nothing short of scandalous. I want a Mayor of London who looks after Londoners interests and nothing else. What the hell is he doing pimping himself in far flung lands ? Corrupt doesn't even begin to describe it.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 97202.html

http://www.gartonjonesnineelmslane.com/ ... tAoddj0AVg

After reading this, Moley: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/com ... 97202.html Is Boris is in the process of converting London to a city state for the ultra rich, on the pattern of Monaco?

I somehow don't see Monaco being duplicated in our area with the multicultural nonsense and behaviour we suffer.

Would be nice though as we've already got the Uxbridge road and the Parkway as our street racing circuit.

_________________
Lets be careful out there !

On the 11th September 2014 the DM reported this from Boris:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ution.html Clearly, replacing fuel tax and with a tax per mile has implications for national taxation rules; rules that would equally apply to other cities and regions.

Was Boris just shooting from the hip with his talk of tax changes in favour of cities? Apparently not; see below for what Cameron said this morning.

Almost immediately after the announcement of the result of the Scottish referendum, and Cameron is talking of “empowering cities”: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... evolt.html
Cameron says:
There you have it; Cameron speaks of “empowering cities”. He effectively means city states in a regionalised England; or a return to the feudal (or should that be fEUdal) system of governance.

Far from Boris offering an alternative to Cameron, he appears to be singing from the same hymn sheet, or secret agenda, as Cameron, Clegg and Miliband.

Now we are beginning to see what was meant over recent years when the political class incessantly talked of “CHANGE” without actually defining what they meant – a change, a break up of the UK into federal and feudal system of governance is the aim, which sits very naturally within the UN's Agenda 21 program.

The closer we get to the end-game, the clearer it all inevitably becomes. The temperature of the water for the frog is becoming uncomfortable, but he still refuses to realise what is happening.

Do the people of Uxbridge really want this offensive man as their MP?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... tters.html

What a buffoon.