Please don't get me wrong, I do not support the need for pornography, but this report in the media today does reveal the dangers of what is going on in the minds of the political and banking elite today.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... sites.html

The hypocrisy here is staggering. It is the political class that insists that 'education material' many of us consider to be pornographic, and increasingly deviant, is legally forced upon our children in the schools.

What is the next step? For 'deniers of man-made global warming/climate change to be denied the purchase of gas, electricity, and fuel? Are advocates of traditional marriage to be barred from any employment or purchases? Are supporters of any political party or group that DOES NOT represent the LibLabCon Party also to be denied employment, the freedom to trade, and access to medical services?

The powers that these politically correct megalomaniacs and their dishonourable banking colleagues are taking to themselves is becoming extremely unpleasant, and downright dangerous.

Cannot see the US going down this path.

The porn industry out there is worth Billions of $$ annually.

Report in the Telegraph recently said there was a discernible drop in US GDP when the Porn industry was shut down for a fortnight over a HIV scare amongst its Actors/Actresses.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/10292056/US-porn-industry-shutdown-blamed-for-skewing-disappointing-jobs-data.html

This is about one thing and one thing only, the powers to be want greater control of the internet. They have seen how the net has assisted the Arab Spring and are terrified that Farage has the cojones and wherewithal to finally break the two party political system which has dominated for over a Century.

All very unnecessary give the quality of screening software available commercially now and the ability of ISP's to filter out certain types of material. The big players Sky, Virgin, BT ect already control access to file sharing and other sites thought to be dealing in copyright infringement and can do so quite easily.

Like Westonman I don't support this stuff per se simply the right of someone to access it if they should so wish.

The illegal stuff child porn and all that is already policed quite heavily and as we know there are stringent punishments in place for those who go down that road.

On a similiar basis I would support permanent chemical castration of convicted sex offenders to stop them offending again. But something we cannot do due to the HRA.

The Government will shortly start to tie in sexual offences to aa link to this material, when the reality is all they will do is drive it underground and make it harder to police in the first place.

I think we are being given a very enlightening insight into the minds of the political elite that rule over us today. They are hypocritical megalomaniacs.

For decades children have been increasingly sexualised at earlier ages with legal backing from governments. Some of the 'educational material' I have seen for use in schools can only be properly described as pornographic, especially when we understand the ages of the children that are to be subjected to this government-backed official material. Governments have arranged free contraception for under-aged school children, an act of encouraging under-aged illegal relationships. Now the government is attempting to compel all under-aged girls to have the HPV vaccine, a jab that should only be of concern to girls who are sexually active; a process that can only be described as incitement to break the law.

We have unmarried and under-aged girls being provided with every government backed assistance for living with babies born outside of a normal relationship, one where a father provides for his own responsibilities.

Much of the music and entertainment world is nothing less than sexualised exploitation of the young, which the government profits from by all the taxes collected.

We have bans on smoking because governments claim that even secondary smoke is far too serious a threat to health, but there is no concern shown by the establishment for the harm caused by forcibly sexualising children at ever younger ages; on the contrary, successive governments have positively legalised the under-aged sexualisation of our children.

Only recently we learned that MPs are downloading huge volumes of pornography on the tax-payer funded Parliamentary computer system for their own entertainment. In addition, there are almost endless stories involving MPs publicising their diverse and promiscuous sexual activities, none of which ever appears to create any sense of shame in the minds of the MPs concerned. If anything, unfavourable publicity concerning sexual activity tends to get swept under the carpet, as in the case of Lib Dem women deciding to leave their Party because of unwanted sexual advances from male members of the Party.

The hypocrisy from the political elite is truly staggering. Now the same political people have set themselves up as judge, jury, and executioner against anybody who buys the material the political elite themselves have created the moral climate for.

The big question now is: What other legal activities will be equally punished by the political elite and their banker colleagues? Will we be barred from purchasing energy, water, or food if we are identified as 'climate change deniers'? Will a traditionally married couple of a man and a woman find themselves barred from employment, or from purchasing life's essentials? Is the trading ban on pornography the first real test case leading to governments punishing anybody who is considered politically incorrect?