Is there more to Mark Reckless' move to UKIP than the EU?

Read Mark Reckless' the letter to the PM here:
http://markreckless.com/2014/07/12/my-l ... e-inquiry/

I can't be categoric here; but I haven't seen any serious mention of Mark Reckless' letter to Cameron in the main-stream-media. I would have thought that letter should have been front page news and comment in any responsible members of the MSM – especially since child abuse is currently such a hot topic.

Nor have I.

The plot thickens.

There is a bit of a date shift. He wrote the letter by the looks of it back in July..

Useful and he is on the record but he could do so much more by telling the press of his concerns of a high level cover up..

I fully agree with you there Geezer. Yes, Mark Reckless could/should have made much more noise about the questions he's raised with Cameron. Perhaps the MSM are not prepared to report on it. However, I do believe that Reckless and UKIP should be shouting these questions from the rooftops. There is an open goal for UKIP to shoot at if only they were prepared to take the lid off the whole child abuse scandal that appears to be rife within the establishment and around Westminster – there are far too many serious question that are simply being ignored.

Even so, Mark Reckless' letter to Cameron demands answers from Cameron; such as; is the whip system using blackmail to force MPs to vote along leaders' party lines? From the number of dodgy bills, even downright immoral bills that get voted through, bills that diametrically oppose public opinion; I suspect there is something very dirty going on. When Parliament routinely votes to go to war on the most flimsiest of reasons and dodgy evidence, something is wrong. When the same Parliament votes for the unnatural; as in redefining marriage between same sex people – again, when public opinion is diametrically opposed – there appears to be something very wrong going on. When so many MPs representing the LibLabCon willingly support the treason against the British people by handing the UK's governance over to the EU – then something is very, very wrong.

Isn't it a well known and accepted fact that the Whips (of all parties) have 'damaging' information on most members of Parliament and they are not backward in coming forward in using this to their advantage when it suits them to do so.

The way the PC argument has evolved in the last few years even a fancy dress picture of a politician posing as Hitler at a college party taken 30 years ago, long before they entered the public arena can now be seen as a 'career ending event'.

It is no secret some former members of Parliament (very possibly some current ones as well) should be investigated by Yewtree but are not.

This case is interesting as it seems a level of evidential proof exists far greater than that used to convict Harris and Travis yet no action is taken.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandy_Smith

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Wyman

Edit to add....

Hold the Front page..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... abuse.html