I would hardly describe Professor Eric Caumes as an "antivaxer". He's reported here as saying that he will take a vaccine if it isn't an RNA vaccine like those being distributed in the UK -
Quote:
He has clearly stated that he will take a anti-COVID-19 vaccine as long as it is not an “RNA” vaccine like those being distributed in the United Kingdom now. "RNA" vaccines are expected to start in France in January with the residents of care homes for the elderly.
The issue that Professor Eric Caumes has is, the known "undesirable side effects with the Pfizer vaccine -
Quote:
Professor Eric Caumes caused the equivalent of a medical earthquake by stating Wednesday evening that he has never seen as many undesirable effects with a vaccine as with the Pfizer injection that is scheduled to be widely distributed in France starting in January.
I regard the term "antivaxer" as a derogatory expression used to intimidate those of a different and reasoned persuasion - a kind of verbal stone throwing by those who have little argument to support their position. It's similar to the use of such accusative terms as "racist", "homophobe", " granny killer" "flat-earther", "white supremacist", "planet destroyer", "Trump supporter"; terms that are designed to kill any conversation/debate where real truth may be uncovered. Such language is all part of the cultural Marxist agenda, where language takes on a false but dictatorial meaning, and without explanation; it's similar to the pulling down of statues of historical figures that don't fit the Marxist agenda – the rewriting of history.
Me, I don't care who takes any particular vaccine, but I do wish to retain the freedom of choice to decide for myself whether to accept or not. Unfortunately, we are living in a time where freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of understanding and freedom of choice are rapidly becoming anathema to those whose aim it is to totally control us.
As for the safety of society, amongst those who do have sufficient scientific knowledge and experience, there are some who have very real concerns that these mRNA, human DNA changing, vaccines may possibly result in the vaccinated becoming hypersensitive to any future interaction with a coronavirus. The fear is, that such an interaction may well result in the rapid death of the vaccinated, and a greater spreading of the disease. Sadly, we don’t know the full truth because the new vaccines are inadequately tested for long term side effects. It does not help that the normal process of the testing of these new vaccines on live animals is being by-passed and avoided. The fact that vaccine manufactures have been given total immunity against any legal claims for damages to anybody who may suffer life changing damage does not inspire confidence. We, the public are supposed to carry all the unknown risks from vaccines that have not been fully tested for long term effects, while the manufactures carry none of the risk – they simply rake in the profits.
I have been permanently damaged by statins prescribed by GPs who failed to take sufficient care with their prescribing. I am now very cautious about blindly taking any medication without first doing my homework. It doesn’t help in our decision making at this present time when we are effectively barred from accessing our own GP so as to have a reasonable conversation to discuss the risks.
We are told by an unqualified and under educated Health Secretary to simply do as he tells us, and, whilst he is laughing at us. However, we do know that the coronavirus outbreak has not resulted in a situation that is any worse than a normal outbreak of annual flue. Government’s own figures support this fact.