WESTLONDONCHAT.COM
https://westlondonchat.com/

Common Purpose
https://westlondonchat.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=777		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Jon [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:39 am ]
Post subject:  Common Purpose
Some of you might remember that months ago Westonman (a possibly Geezer, I think) warned us about a shady, shadowy organisation called "Common Purpose".

The Mail did a huge expose about it the other day... pages and pages. Made compelling reading.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -best.html
Author:  Kremmen [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
This level of corruption doesn't surprise me in the slightest.

I've no doubt most politicians are feathering their nest for future times in the knowledge they will be shielded from what's to come.

We need a complete new direction that the main parties seem oblivious to. I think this is why UKIP is overtaking the Lib Dems in places.
Author:  jim [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
Said it before, you vote for one set of crooks, or another set of crooks.
Author:  geezer466 [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
Common Purpose exists for one main reason to allow those at the very highest levels of society and governance to network together and come to consensus on what is best for the whole.

The Mail took the angle on how those close to the Leveson enquiry and the good judge himself and will be key in the enquiry findings are members of this organisation and how some of them have previously campaigned for restrictions on the press. Others have been harmed by stories appearing in the popular press for which they didn't sue so we have to assume the stories were true.

So the allegation (loosely made) is that there is a vested interest (not Government) but interested parties and organisations in cracking down on press freedoms right at the heart of Leveson.

Then lets take Newsnight and the pa lava last week about the former treasurer of the Tory party... There is a connection which I will explain in due course.

But before I do that lets step back even further. Clearly child abuse has hit the headlines in the last Month or so and with some huge revelations with Saville. There was the BBC (Newsnight) shall we run the story or shall we not run with the allegations and then not doing so, then the ITV report which was aired which brought it all out.

Subsequently the BBC were accused of trying to bury the story which seems plausible now we have some idea of the depths of Saville's abuse and the fact clearly he was a predatory paedophile.

As a consequence of all this many other people come forward to say they were abused by Saville and a story re-emerges to do with a Children's home in North Wales (this itself was subject to a public enquiry some years ago the efficiency, ethics and probity of which have been since questioned). Out of the woodwork comes a chap by the name of Steve Meesham who alleged he was abused by the gentleman I alluded to above.

Newsnight again ran this story without actually naming the person. The person himself did not respond until quite a few days later after it turned out there had been a mis identification by this chap Meesham.

Meesham was forced to issue an apology with the good Lord popping up on TV a few minutes later all nicely choreographed.

The news spotlight since has moved from the child abuse angle to how can an independent broadcaster like the BBC can libel a former high profile politician..... The very nature and work of the BBC are coming under scrutiny and they were 'obliged' to pay the good lord £185,000 and they didn't even name him.... In addition the Director General was forced to step down.

The news focus should have remained on the abuse as people were coming forward. At a stroke it was moved to the libel issue and this chap Steve Meesham was completely and absolutely ridiculed (did anyone see the hatchet job the Mail did on him?). Clearly this is going to influence whether other people are going to come forward in the future..

As to the libel itself. David Icke made the original allegations about the good lord in a book in 1998, so did Scallywag magazine also some years ago. These occurrences named the person directly but he took no action to seek redress via the libel laws? Why was that?

Another high profile blogger by the name of Chris Spivey has also overtly named him but seems immune from legal action. Google is your friend and a search on both those names will bring you to some pages with some eye watering allegations which strangely seems immune from libel action.

So in the space of a few days we have moved from a story of what seems like systematic child abuse in the care system to one which questions the brevity and freedoms of the BBC and the wider press and all at a time when Leveson is drawing up his report to Parliament assisted by some interested parties who may have reasons of their own to curtail press freedoms.

Coming back to Common Purpose and the main thrust of this thread (although I accept it will go off at at a tangent now) with the networking and common purpose (interests) it would have been relatively simple to drop certain persons onto Leveson's assistance panel.

At this juncture I will leave this although I hope to continue to contribute to this thread going forward dependant on the interest in the subject material.

I will leave though with 2 points to think about.

Someone once wrote an ideal way to treat the media is thus....

Quote:
Spread false defeat to gain public sympathy; or false accusation and then arrange for it to be exposed as such – so the accuser will forever be treated with suspicion.’


Google the phrase and see if you can find out who it was. You well may be surprised....

The idea of child molesters in very high political places is not a new one..... There has long been a suspicion that this problem goes to the very heart of the British establishment.

Once such example who had a very close relationship with the Kray twins..... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Boothby
Author:  Westonman [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
This site is one to watch:
http://www.ukcolumn.org/
Author:  Westonman [ Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
Theresa May appointed a Common Purpose agent to re-investigate North Wales child abuse:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/ ... intcmp=239

Quote:
The home secretary, Theresa May, has appointed the chief of the National Crime Agency to conduct an investigation into how North Wales police handled allegations of child abuse in the 1970s and 1980s.
Keith Bristow, the director general of the NCA, is to review how police originally handled the case, as well as look at the latest allegations by one of the victims.
May made her statement to MPs following fresh allegations by the BBC Newsnight programme and others that both the police and a subsequent public inquiry led by Sir Ronald Waterhouse into abuse at almost 40 children's homes in the region were not carried out properly, and claims of a cover-up on behalf of a close ally of Lady Thatcher.
"The government is treating these allegations with the utmost seriousness," May told MPs. "Child abuse is a hateful, abhorrent and disgusting crime and we must not allow these allegations to go unanswered."


Warwickshire Police confirm that Keith Bristow, the director general of the National Crime Agency. is a graduate of COMMON PURPOSE:
http://onlinenews.warwickshire.police.u ... lease_view
Quote:
Keith (Bristow) completed the Police Service �Accelerated Promotion Scheme' in 1995 and the �Strategic Command Course' in 2001. He has also completed the European Police College �Top Senior Police Officers' Course', the National School of Government �Top Management Programme', and the Birmingham University �Malvern Programme', and he is a graduate of Common Purpose. He holds a Masters Degree in Organisational Development, a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management Studies and a Diploma in Applied Criminology.
Author:  geezer466 [ Mon Nov 26, 2012 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
Surprise, surprise look who has turned out is on a Common Purpose Advisory group!! Big Story from yesterday nearly made me choke on my cornflakes.

Page 87 http://www.ocvs.govt.nz/documents/publications/newsletters/2168-networks-local-communities.pdf

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20474120 And no wonder there is a serious problem with child grooming gangs in the industrial northern mill towns where people in charge of children's services cannot focus on the problem in hand.

http://rotherhampolitics.wordpress.com/2012/09/29/joyce-thackers-priority-find-the-whistle-blower/
Quote:
In the week that the public of Rotherham found out just how incompetent its civic leaders were you would have thought that the Director in charge of Children Services in Rotherham Joyce Thacker would have been focused on ensuring our children remained safe and that scarce resources were being used appropriately.

Not for Joyce Thacker, the Advertiser reports that she will be asking South Yorkshire Police to start an investigation into who leaked the documents to the Times, a great pity she is not more interested in investigating the grooming gangs who abuse children.

This is the week that Rotherham parents found out that Stone, Wright, Lakin, Hoddinott and Kimber all knew that if you dropped your daughter off at Meadowhall to go shopping with her friends there were young boys who would befriend them and gradually over time groom them ready to be introduced and sexually abused by their uncle and his mates.


Mixed race marriages will be at risk of losing their kids if this attitude is allowed to propagate.....

Very worrying development and I begin to wonder if Cameron is allowing the undeserved negativity to heap on UKIP in the hope of damaging them at the polls. UKIP is going to seriously split the Tory vote. The Labour leadership were very quick to leap to the defence of UKIP yesterday.
Author:  Kremmen [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
I must admit I'm leaning towards UKIP
Author:  jim [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
As far as I can see they are not so much gaining favour, as the disenchantment too the rest, what a platform to get elected on, (we are not as bad as the others) Labour fail too read the mood of the Country and believe state reliance is the way forward, Tory's are trust me I will look after your piggy bank until things get better, UKIP is you cant trust them, but we will fall in with any of them if we can get the balance of power, a vote for them is I dont know so will tag along, and see what happens, what I would like to see is all the independant lot get elected 630 members with their contrasting views fight it out in the big house, could it be any worse than now ??? :o :lol: 8-) :evil: :cry:
Author:  Westonman [ Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Common Purpose
An introduction to Common Purpose.

David Icke Interviews Brian Gerrish about Common Purpose:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzyCU5B3j3s


Those of you who have attended any kind of management/leadership training courses over the last 25 years or so, may recognise some of the techniques that Brian Gerrish is talking about in the above interview.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/