They're at it again. I was amazed though that THE TIMES should expose this, as it's run some abysmal leader columns in the past on the subject...

Close up

I couldn't actually read that article but my rather simplistic view and opinion is that our climate is constantly changing, and has done so for hundreds, if not thousands of years.

We are naive to believe we can influence or change it. Making a few rich landowners even richer by sticking up a few more windfarms which run at a loss on their property is about as mad as it gets.

Precisely Moley. If you click on the close up you should get a bigger version which will give you the general drift.

We live in the age of Mass Deception.

The whole of the global warming/climate change nonsense is proof positive that deceit and lies have become the standard mode of operation of the political class and the establishment. Every word they say should automatically be regarded as a lie until it can be clearly proven otherwise.

The deceit and blatant dishonesty has been willingly adopted by every branch of the media, the press, all officialdom, local authorities, the education system, and corporate business. The scam has become the insane dogma of the false religion for the coming fascist system of a one-world global government.

I have tried discussing global warming/climate change with officialdom, including my MP. The blatant refusal by these people to even consider that their 'theory' may be wrong is a powerful indicator that truth and integrity is completely alien to them. Frankly, the stubborn refusal of officialdom to enter into debate on this matter is quite scary; it is like dealing with mindless automatons where the automatic response is - “there is a consensus”; and none of them will accept that science is not proven by consensus. The whole of humanity can say that black is white, but that will only prove that consensus makes the whole of humanity to be fools.

Sadly, we don't need to be very clever to see that we are being fed a load lies. Our weather forecasters freely tell us that on cloudless nights the temperature will fall due to the lack of cloud cover. This should at least cause us all to question whether CO2 or water vapour have the greatest effect at retaining heat. The clouds (water vapour) go missing and the temperature at night falls more than on a cloudy night, but the CO2 levels remain the same. Similarly with the sun; when the sun goes down so does the temperature; which should suggest to all of us that the sun is a major factor in heating this planet – but officialdom refuses to acknowledge that the variability in the sun's output has anything to do with global temperature.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27465050



Oh crumbs what a disaster.... 0.43mm a year you say? Literally about the width of this I on your pc screen right now. Or about an inch and a half every hundred years provided of course this is not a short term trend that reverses in the meantime.

Vested Interests playing on the mathematical ineptitude of the masses?

Totally agree. 'Climate Change' is a control mechanism and a revenue generator adopted by 'the establishment'.

The idea that sea level could even be measured to that accuracy is laughable. It would be pretty hard to get an accurate measurent to with a foot I should think and even that sort of rise in mean sea levels, which ain't ever gonna happen, would pronably make not a lot of difference to anything or anyone. It's all total nonsense.

I'll come back to this subject as soon as I can get my computer sorted