Rich Kid wrote:
Why is it that it always seems to be gangs of Pakistani young men who are involved? Are they brought up to believe that all white non-Islamic girls are whores? It seems that way.
Perhaps that is what the media and the political class want you to believe. As far as I know, Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, Cyril Smith, and many, many other big names that are doing the rounds are/were not Islamic Pakistanis.
The quote below, from the link provided by Father Ted, suggests that a cover-up has been practiced by the police and officialdom:
Quote:
Following the 2010 case, the Times claimed that details from 200 restricted-access documents showed how police and child protection agencies in the South Yorkshire town had extensive knowledge of these activities for a decade, yet a string of offences went unprosecuted.
The allegations led to a range of official investigations, including one by the home affairs select committee.
Last year, the South Yorkshire police and crime commissioner, Shaun Wright, said there had been "a failure of management" at South Yorkshire police as he responded to a report into the force on this issue by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC).
Are the officials and the police protecting a person or persons? We know from reports surrounding Jimmy Savile that the police failed to follow through with their investigations – WHY?
There are many reports suggesting there are some very suspicious individuals in and around Westminster – with at least one of them advertising himself on the 'web' wearing only his underpants. If it is acceptable to imply that abusers from an ethnic minority indicate that particular grouping has a tendency to prey upon white females, then should we conclude that all within Westminster and the BBC are peadophilic abusers? And since the police appear to be making so many failures to fully investigate paedophiles, shouldn't we be concluding that the police and officialdom are in on the crime?